Hungary’s decisive election result – where nearly 80% of the electorate turned out in a vote that ended the incumbent’s 16-year tenure in office – carries implications that extend beyond the country’s borders. In recent years, Hungary has found itself in a particularly important position amid geopolitical crosscurrents.
Viktor Orbán, who led Hungary for 16 consecutive years – longer than any European leader – was defeated by Péter Magyar, a 45-year-old former party insider who convinced voters to bring the “electoral autocracy” to an end. Magyar’s Tisza party won a two-thirds majority of seats in parliament and a share of the vote larger than a single party has received since the fall of communism nearly four decades ago.1
This outcome gives Magyar scope to overturn Orbán’s increasingly unpopular domestic policies and reset Hungary’s global relationships. Orbán has been a close partner of Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, and more recently US President Donald Trump, so much so that US Vice President JD Vance visited Budapest and campaigned on behalf of Orbán in the final week before the election. Orbán was also frequently at odds with the European Union and Ukraine.2
To understand the significance of this result, it is worth revisiting Orbán’s political trajectory. Orbán made his mark on Hungary in the late 1980s, as the Soviet Union began to collapse, by setting up a political movement called Fidesz, the Alliance of Young Democrats.3 He briefly studied liberal political philosophy at the University of Oxford before leaving to campaign in the 1990 elections. Fidesz won 22 seats. As a young MP, Orbán’s party joined the global Liberal International movement in 1992, but his ideology seemed to shift during the second half of the 1990s. At the time, Hungary was governed by a liberal-socialist coalition, and Orbán began repositioning his party towards the centre-right.4
In 1998, Orbán led Fidesz to victory and at 35, became Europe’s youngest prime minister, bringing Hungary into NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) in 1999.5 He lost office twice in 2002 and 2006, but the global financial crisis of 2007/08 paved the way for his return to power in 2010, after which he led Hungary for 16 years.6
During his 16 years in office, Orbán transformed Hungary with sweeping changes to its laws and constitution. He won four elections in a row – more than any other European Union leader7– and made constitutional changes that drew international criticism. Some legislation adopted under Orbán brought Hungary into conflict with the EU, including restrictions on civil society organisations and the refusal to implement EU migration policies.8
In July 2015, as refugees and migrants entered the EU through Hungary’s borders, Orbán drew a “clear link between illegal immigrants coming to Europe and the spread of terrorism”. He stated, “We would like to keep Europe for Europeans… also we want… to preserve Hungary for Hungarians.”9
The European Commission took legal action against Hungary on several occasions.10 In March, Orbán refused to drop his opposition to a €90 billion loan for Ukraine. EU leaders voiced their frustrations with Orbán who refused to sign off on the loan agreed in 2025.11
Hungary’s energy policy under Orbán also faced criticism from the EU, as it centred on maintaining Russian oil and gas supplies even after Russia invaded Ukraine. Orbán was critical of the EU’s efforts to reduce its dependence on Russian supplies following the 2022 invasion. By September 2022, a European Parliament report stated that Hungary could no longer be considered a full democracy and labelled it an elected autocracy.12
With Orbán’s long tenure now over, attention turns to Hungary’s new leadership. Some argue that Hungary’s right-wing leader simply stopped being popular. Orbán and other right-wing politicians who lose popularity tend not to follow the Russian principle that politics involves strain between “the television” – propaganda – and “the refrigerator” – people’s lived reality.13 The day after the election, Magyar reiterated this, saying, “For years, Viktor Orbán has paid no attention to the problems affecting Hungarians.”14
Magyar campaigned on a platform of distancing Hungary from Russia in favour of closer ties with the EU and Ukraine. On 12 April, he told supporters that his priority was to dismantle parts of Orbán’s system, including replacing Fidesz-aligned heads of the Supreme Court, the prosecution service and various independent agencies overseeing the media, the judiciary, the state budget and policing of anti-competition laws.15 Magyar also said Hungary would rejoin the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, a wing of the European Union that investigates financial crimes. This would allow investigators the authority to examine fraud cases involving the previous administration, including members of Orbán’s family.16
Hungarian equities surged to their best day since 2022, despite broader losses across European assets. The Hungarian forint was the strongest performing global currency on 13 April, rising nearly 4% against the dollar.17
As for the geopolitical outlook, it is still early days. Hungary may distance itself from Russia and move closer to the EU and Ukraine, as per Magyar’s campaign promise. How Magyar’s relationship with Trump and the US will evolve, remains uncertain.
Hungary’s election is a reminder that extended political cycles – even those that appear firmly entrenched – can shift quickly. For investors, the key question is not ideology but political direction and whether a change in leadership can translate into greater institutional alignment with major trading partners, improved access to EU funding and a more predictable regulatory backdrop.
Hungary’s vote comes at a pivotal moment for European foreign policy. EU discussions over additional financial and military support for Ukraine have required unanimous agreement, with Hungary under Orbán often acting as a constraint on further assistance. A change in government therefore raises the possibility of smoother decision-making on future Ukraine aid packages and broader EU defence coordination.
At the same time, the geopolitical backdrop is becoming more complex. Russia’s deepening cooperation with Iran – including reported intelligence-sharing and broader security coordination – is contributing to a realignment of strategic relationships between the Middle East, Europe and the US. This has reinforced concerns among policymakers that the conflict in Ukraine is becoming more interconnected with other tensions, which could potentially influence how Western government prioritise military and financial resources.
While the shift in Hungary may be viewed as constructive for EU cohesion and potentially for coordination on Ukraine, it also comes against a backdrop of an increasingly multipolar global order. The loss of a frequently used intermediary negotiating position between the US, the EU and Russia could have wider-ranging consequences, potentially reshaping how emerging geopolitical blocs interact or align over time.
For now, markets are responding to the prospect of stronger growth as democratic institutions are bolstered. More broadly, investors will be closely watching how Russia responds to the likely rapprochement Hungary will seek with the EU and the potential ripple effects.
[1] Orbán era swept away by Péter Magyar's Hungary election landslide - BBC News
[2] Orbán era swept away by Péter Magyar's Hungary election landslide - BBC News
[3] Who is Viktor Orban, Hungarian PM with 14-year grip on power? - BBC News
[4] Who is Viktor Orban, Hungarian PM with 14-year grip on power? - BBC News
[5] Who is Viktor Orban, Hungarian PM with 14-year grip on power? - BBC News
[6] Who is Viktor Orban, Hungarian PM with 14-year grip on power? - BBC News
[7] How Orban Lost His Touch, and Hungary’s Election - The New York Times
[8] Hungary under Viktor Orbán: Developments and EU reaction since 2022 - House of Commons Library
[9] Who is Viktor Orban, Hungarian PM with 14-year grip on power? - BBC News
[10] Hungary under Viktor Orbán: Developments and EU reaction since 2022 - House of Commons Library
[11] Hungary's Orbán accused of disloyalty and blackmail over Ukraine loan veto - BBC News
[12] Hungary under Viktor Orbán: Developments and EU reaction since 2022 - House of Commons Library
[13] How Orban Lost His Touch, and Hungary’s Election - The New York Times
[14] How Orban Lost His Touch, and Hungary’s Election - The New York Times
[15] How Peter Magyar Defeated Viktor Orban, a Former Ally, In Hungary’s Election - The New York Times
[16] How Peter Magyar Defeated Viktor Orban, a Former Ally, In Hungary’s Election - The New York Times
[17] Deutsche Bank
LGT Wealth Management UK LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Registered in England and Wales: OC329392. Registered office: 14 Cornhill, London, EC3V 3NR. LGT Wealth Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in Scotland number SC317950 at Capital Square, 58 Morrison Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8BP. LGT Wealth Management Jersey Limited is incorporated in Jersey and is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of Investment Business and Funds Service Business: 102243. Registered office: Sir Walter Raleigh House, 48-50 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QB. LGT Wealth Management (CI) Limited is registered in Jersey and is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission: 5769. Registered Office: at Sir Walter Raleigh House, 48 – 50 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QB. LGT Wealth Management US Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is a Registered Investment Adviser with the US Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Registered in England and Wales: 06455240. Registered Office: 14 Cornhill, London, EC3V 3NR.
This communication is provided for information purposes only. The information presented is not intended and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice to buy and/or sell any specific investments or participate in any investment (or other) strategy and should not be construed as such. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of LGT Wealth Management US Limited as a whole or any part thereof. Although the information is based on data which LGT Wealth Management US Limited considers reliable, no representation or warranty (express or otherwise) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Publication, and LGT Wealth Management US Limited and its employees accept no liability for the consequences of acting upon the information contained herein. Information about potential tax benefits is based on our understanding of current tax law and practice and may be subject to change. The tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each individual and may be subject to change in the future.
All investments involve risk and may lose value. Your capital is always at risk. Any investor should be aware that past performance is not an indication of future performance, and that the value of investments and the income derived from them may fluctuate, and they may not receive back the amount they originally invested.
