Market View

Steering US forecasts through tariff turbulence

Empire State building in New York skyline with a red and purple night sky at sunset.

At a glance

  • Trump’s erratic policies and heightened uncertainty will distort macroeconomic data
  • Tariffs are expected to transmit into inflation with a delay of a few months
  • Focusing on GDP components consumption and private investments provide a clearer picture of US economy

Since Donald Trump’s inauguration, the United States entered a new era of erratic policymaking that knows neither friend nor foe—only America first. Four months into his term, President Trump issued more than 150 executive orders that began to reshape the geopolitical and economic landscape. Key policies introduced so far increased tariff rates, restricted immigration and heightened uncertainty, which is expected to distort macroeconomic measures such as consumer prices, economic growth and employment.

Predicting US macroeconomic variables became difficult as a stroke of a pen in the White House often changed business conditions fundamentally. Previously useful indicators derived from soft survey and hard data turned volatile, frequently surprising market participants in direction and magnitude. For example, CPI inflation and the unemployment rate have remained surprisingly calm, while the first GDP print of this year turned negative. Such seemingly contradicting data movements mean forecasting during the political and macroeconomic turbulence will be challenging.

Calm inflation is deceiving

Tariffs increase the price of foreign goods, which should lead to consumer price inflation. Yet inflation has declined since Trump’s inauguration. We expect the transmission of elevated tariffs on inflation will take a few months for various reasons. Firms tend to draw on their inventories before they raise prices to remain competitive, and the pass-through from imported raw materials and intermediary goods prices to consumer goods (and later services) prices generally takes time.

Early signals, however, suggest that inflationary pressures are rising. Prices paid by purchasing managers for manufactured goods and for services have risen significantly in the recent months. We expect that these pressures will materialise more visibly over the summer, potentially lifting inflation from 2.4% in May to 2.8% in June, and further out to a peak of 3.3% in September. These emerging price pressures support the Federal Reserve’s cautious and data-dependent approach to monetary policy.

Trade policies leading to large dispersions in GDP components

During the first days of his second term, Trump announced broad tariff rates to reshore manufacturing and reduce trade deficits. While the scale of tariffs unveiled on his so-called Liberation Day was stunning, their introduction was widely expected. In anticipation of tariffs, consumers and businesses frontloaded imports and filled up their inventories. As shown in Figure 1, the surge in imports dragged down net exports, which weighed on first quarter GDP by -1.2 percentage points (rising imports means more goods were imported rather than produced domestically, which weighs on GDP if more goods are not exported simultaneously). This was partially countered by a positive contribution of inventories. Ultimately, GDP declined by 0.1% quarter-over-quarter, lifted close to zero by the personal consumption and fixed investment components. We expect the trade policy effects to largely reverse in the current quarter. Inventories will likely be reduced, dragging on overall private investments, and imports will fall, which, we expect, results in an overall Q2 GDP growth of 0.5%.

Figure 1: LGT forecast of GDP growth (QoQ) and the contribution of its components

Figure 1: LGT forecast of GDP growth (QoQ) and the contribution of its components
Source: LGT, Bloomberg

Note: The projections presented are based on current data and assumptions and are subject to change. They should not be interpreted as guarantees of future performance, as unforeseen economic, political, or market developments may impact outcomes.

Immigration: A drag on growth, a buffer for labour markets

In the recent years, immigration has been a key driver of US GDP growth by boosting consumption and investment while dampening wage costs. However, the new administration’s restrictive stance, as evidenced with the developing situation in Los Angeles, is now weighing on growth. At the same time, reduced immigration is curbing labour supply, potentially mitigating a rise in the unemployment rate.

We project the unemployment rate will rise moderately, from 4.2% in May to 4.5% by year-end. The largely resilient labour market would remove pressure on the Federal Reserve (Fed) to act quickly, giving policymakers time to weigh tariff-induced inflation against its economic damage before resuming rate cuts. Markets are currently pricing in two quarter point cuts by year-end.

The hidden cost of tariffs

Beyond their delayed impact to price inflation, tariffs are already dampening economic activity due to heightened uncertainty. Rapid and unpredictable shifts in the US trade policy are unsettling consumers and businesses alike as it limits their forward planning. In such an environment, they postpone consumption and investment decisions until economic conditions stabilise.

The fallout is already reflected in sentiment data. The Consumer Sentiment Index of the University of Michigan is currently at levels seen during the recent inflation crisis, and the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence is also still slightly depressed despite a strong recovery from its slump in the first four months of 2025.

Guidance during the tariff turbulences

In this turbulent economic landscape, clarity is hard to come by. Yet by focusing on the vital drivers of growth and inflation, we can chart a path forward. As Trump’s trade policy shifts introduce large swings in trade and inventories, focusing on private consumption and fixed investments—which account for 68% and 18% of GDP respectively —provides a clearer picture of the current state of the US economy. While private fixed investment grew strongly in Q1, driven by large spending on information processing equipment, consumption growth slowed. We expect both GDP components to decelerate below trend, though not enough to tip the US economy into recession. Overall, we forecast that increased tariffs, reduced immigration and prolonged uncertainty will reduce US GDP growth to around 1.2% and increase inflation towards 3.1% in 2025 and anticipate the Fed will cut rates two more times towards year-end.

[1] Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, Bureau of Economic Analysis: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=53&eid=13146#snid=13148

LGT Wealth Management UK LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Registered in England and Wales: OC329392. Registered office: 14 Cornhill, London, EC3V 3NR.  LGT Wealth Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in Scotland number SC317950 at Capital Square, 58 Morrison Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8BP. LGT Wealth Management Jersey Limited is incorporated in Jersey and is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission in the conduct of Investment Business and Funds Service Business: 102243. Registered office: Sir Walter Raleigh House, 48-50 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QB.  LGT Wealth Management (CI) Limited is registered in Jersey and is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission: 5769. Registered Office: at Sir Walter Raleigh House, 48 – 50 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3QB.  LGT Wealth Management US Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is a Registered Investment Adviser with the US Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Registered in England and Wales: 06455240. Registered Office: 14 Cornhill, London, EC3V 3NR. 

This communication is provided for information purposes only. The information presented is not intended and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice to buy and/or sell any specific investments or participate in any investment (or other) strategy and should not be construed as such. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of LGT Wealth Management US Limited as a whole or any part thereof. Although the information is based on data which LGT Wealth Management US Limited considers reliable, no representation or warranty (express or otherwise) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Publication, and LGT Wealth Management US Limited and its employees accept no liability for the consequences of acting upon the information contained herein. Information about potential tax benefits is based on our understanding of current tax law and practice and may be subject to change. The tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each individual and may be subject to change in the future.

All investments involve risk and may lose value. Your capital is always at risk. Any investor should be aware that past performance is not an indication of future performance, and that the value of investments and the income derived from them may fluctuate, and they may not receive back the amount they originally invested.

About the author
1702581895162
Dr. Felix Kapfhammer, Economist

As an economist at LGT, Dr. Felix Kapfhammer is responsible for macroeconomic forecasting and the analysis of various economies. He undertook his academic training at renowned universities and business schools in Germany, the Czech Republic, the US and Norway and successfully completed his doctorate in 2023.

Market View

Post-Liberation Day rebound: confidence returns to the markets

Following the sharp sell-off in global equity markets around Liberation Day, we’ve witnessed a robust and broad-based recovery in global equities that has surprised many investors.
Bond yield prices display screen
Market View

Rising yields and growing debt piles: the new reality for bond investors

Since the late 1980s, many investors have relied on the 60/40 portfolio as a core strategy. However, this investment approach has come under pressure over the past few years.